Miscellany 42: US Hypocrisy in Kosovo; Only
Whites Can Be Racist; The Kennedys Endorse Obama; Fishing in Sierra Leone; Observing Presidents’ Day;
Weaving a Flaw into a Rug; America Favors Illegal Immigrants over Its Own
Citizens; Sharing Rooms on Business Trips; Euphemisms; The US Government Caused
the Mortgage Crisis; Organized Religion Serves the State; The Advantage of
Speaking English; Whatever Happened to Paul Wolfowitz?;
If We Leave Iraq It Will Be a Disaster; The US Government Wages War on the
Middle Class; US Presidential Candidates Are Duplicitous Dissimulators; Roger Milliken Knows the Score; The US Government is
Systematically Destroying the US Middle Class; Life Is Like a Football Game;
The Yellow Sun; Security at US Embassies; Mass Deportation Now!; All
Immigration Is Destroying the US, Not Just Illegal Immigration; A Tale of Two
Countries: The United States and Russia; Eugenics: US Illuminati Working to
Improve US Gene Pool; Hitler’s Consternation; Star Wars; Building Temporary
Homes for a Temporary Society; Radical Egalitarianism: Alive and Well In US
Schools; Ralph Nader for President; Sleepless in
Monrovia; Masdar, the Green City
© 2008 Joseph George Caldwell. All rights reserved. Posted at Internet web
sites http://www.foundation.bw and http://www.foundationwebsite.org
. May be copied or reposted for
non-commercial use, with attribution. (19 February 2008, updated 25 February 2008; corrected 11 May 2008)
Commentary on recent news, reading and
events of personal interest.
Hypocrisy in Kosovo
Whites Can Be Racist
Kennedys Endorse Obama
in Sierra Leone
a Flaw into a Rug
Favors Illegal Immigrants over Its Own Citizens
Rooms on Business Trips
US Government Caused the Mortgage Crisis
Religion Serves the State
Advantage of Speaking English
Happened to Paul Wolfowitz?
We Leave Iraq, It Will Be a Disaster?.
US Government Wages War on the US Middle Class
Presidential Candidates Are Duplicitous Dissimulators
Milliken Knows the Score
US Government Is Systematically Destroying the US Middle Class
Is Like a Football Game
at US Embassies
All Immigration Is Destroying the US,
Not Just Illegal Immigration
Tale of Two Countries: The United States and Russia
US Illuminati Working to Improve US Gene Pool
Temporary Homes for a Temporary Society
Egalitarianism: Alive and Well In US Schools
Nader for President
the Green City
On Sunday, February
17, 2008, the Serbian province
issued a unilateral declaration of independence. This declaration was opposed by Serbia,
which has long-standing historical and cultural claims to this territory. The declaration was supported by the United
States, which immediately (the very next
day, which was in fact a national holiday (Presidents’ Day)) extended political
recognition to the breakaway province.
What hypocrisy! The US
is quite generous in support of the principle of self-determination of peoples,
as long as it doesn’t apply to itself.
My home state, South Carolina,
attempted to secede from the Union in 1861, and the US
government waged a bloody four-year war, costing a million lives, to prevent
government goes to great lengths to suppress white racism, such as in the case
of its successful efforts to destroy the white government of the Republic
of South Africa. It turns a blind eye, however, to non-white
racism. This Thursday, February 21, 2008, President George W. Bush
pays a state visit to Liberia,
where I am currently working. Under the
Liberian Constitution, no white person born in Liberia
is entitled to Liberian citizenship. I
wonder what Mr. Bush will have to say about that.
A few weeks ago, Senator Ted Kennedy and his niece Caroline
endorsed Senator Barack Obama
as their candidate of choice for nominee of the Democratic Party in this year’s
contest for the US
As principal sponsor of the Immigration Act of 1965, Senator
Kennedy has done more than any other single person to destroy the US. This Act marked the beginning of the current
era of massive immigration from all cultures to the US. In 1965, US
population was 190 million people. By
1972, the US
had achieved the so-called “demographic transition,” in which the national
birth rate had fallen (for both whites and blacks) to replacement level (two
children per woman in her lifetime). The
population in 1972 was 210 million people.
Since 1965, almost solely because of mass immigration, the US
population has exploded to over 300 million, and it continues to grow by about
three million every year, all from immigrants and their progeny. On average, every immigrant to the US
results in the destruction of an acre of natural land, owing to conversion to
infrastructure (roads, homes, schools, hospitals, stores, office buildings,
parking lots and the like). This works
out to the destruction of one hundred million acres of natural land since
passage of the Act. Massive immigration
to the US has
resulted in the destruction of natural beauty on a grand scale. When the Act was passed, it was an easy
matter to camp in national and state forests, in peace. Now, crowds are everywhere. It may take a year to get a camping permit in
a national park, and it now costs thousands of dollars to ride down a wild
Mass immigration has resulted not only in the destruction of
natural land on a massive scale, but on the destruction of US
culture and quality of life for the US
middle class. An immigrant to the US
from a poor country consumes up to ten times as much
commercial energy as he did in his home country. Mass immigration to the US
from poor countries hence causes the burning of much more fossil fuel, and
contributes tremendously to atmospheric pollution and global warming. The US
would consume about half as much energy today, had the Act not been passed and
the population remained stable or declined.
Senator Kennedy is a traitor to US
culture and the US
middle class. Massive immigration serves
only the wealthy elite. It destroys the
land and culture and quality of life for everyone else. Senator Kennedy is quite willing to destroy US
environment, culture and the middle class to make the rich richer. His endorsement of anyone should be viewed as
an indictment of that person.
Caroline who? Why
would the media comment on the endorsement of a person who, from the viewpoint
of national politics, is a non-entity?
On CNN a few days ago was a report on the current situation
in Sierra Leone. A fisherman was interviewed and asked about
his situation. He said that because of industrial-scale
fishing by large boats from other countries, it now took him 2-3 days to catch
the same amount of fish that he used to catch in three hours.
Massive human population and industrialization destroy the
natural world. When I was a boy, the Grand
Banks off Canada
was one of the great fishing areas of the world. It totally collapsed from overfishing
and never recovered. The Cascapedia River,
where my mother was born, was one of the great salmon fishing rivers in the
world. As part of their breeding cycle,
salmon leave the river and travel far into the ocean. Large Japanese commercial ships stood
offshore and caught virtually all of the salmon. The Japanese destroyed the Cascapedia River
as a major salmon fishing site.
Local fishermen around the world have seen large commercial
fishing boats fish out their waters and destroy their livelihoods and way of
life. Their governments lie idly by and
cry crocodile tears, preferring to make more money in the short term from
commercial fishing. They don’t care that
their local fishermen lose their incomes or way of life. They do not care about nature. All they care about is the money. They have sold their people’s livelihood and
culture and natural resources for a few pieces of silver.
18, 2008, was Presidents’ Day.
We used to have two President’s Days – Washington’s Birthday and Lincoln’s
Birthday. In the rush to honor Martin
Luther King with a day of his own, both of the President’s Days were collapsed
into one, and the names of the individual honorees were dropped.
How the US
can replace honoring President George Washington, the “father” of the country,
with King, defies explanation. King was
a pastor. He was also a satyr, a lecher,
a rake. While many political leaders are
moral reprobates, they have not taken vows to uphold high moral principles, and
they rarely preach on the subject. As a
man of the cloth, however, King’s moral turpitude was in direct opposition to
his profession. His life was a lie. His private life betrayed his public
life. King was a hypocrite, a traitor to
his professed principles. It was not a
careless single fling or a mistress that we are talking about here, but an
endless string of blatant one-night-stands and infidelities. No one forced King to become a pastor. He chose that profession, and then chose to betray
it and disgrace himself.
It is a sign of the depths to which the US has fallen, and
of how far removed it has become from its founding principles and culture, that
it would choose to honor a repeated liar and cheat over the founding father of
the country, and replace Washington’s Birthday with Martin Luther King Day.
With respect to sexual transgressions, US
society maintains a double standard. Had
a well-known white pastor committed Kings adulteries,
he would have been disgraced and drummed out of his church. But King receives adulation instead of
condemnation. As a culture, blacks will
never be held in high regard when they revere immoral men like King and Marion
Berry. It is certainly reasonable to
judge a group by the men it honors. For
blacks to honor King depreciates their race.
For Americans to honor King in place of Washington
shows how far the country’s moral values have declined and its culture changed.
When I lived in Egypt,
my wife and I visited a rug factory. It
was very interesting to see how much time, effort and
skill are required to make an oriental (“Persian”) rug. The weavers are young girls, about age
I was told that a flaw is deliberately woven into every rug,
so that it cannot possibly be represented as “perfect.” This practice reflects the view that only God
can create perfect things, and it would be presumptuous of man to represent that
he had created something perfect.
This is really an absurd view. Deliberately weaving a flaw into a rug to
avoid its perfection is tantamount to admitting that it is in fact possible for man to make a perfect rug. So the practice, which purports to assert
that only God can create perfection, is in fact a denial of the very thing it
purports to assert. The practice of
weaving deliberate flaws into rugs should be viewed as extreme hubris, not
extreme humility. It is laughable in its
There are many things in the physical universe that are in
fact perfect, and can be implemented by man.
If you add one and one together, the result is two. Exactly and perfectly. If you define perfection in a rug as a rug
that has each knot made in the same manner, then perfection is easily achieved,
even by a machine.
America Favors Illegal Immigrants over Its Own
If a US
citizen assaults a federal government agent, he will go to jail for five
years. If an illegal alien does so, he
is simply deported. US citizens are
required to pay for health care services that illegal aliens receive free of
charge at hospital emergency rooms. Some
states grant “in-state” tuition to illegal aliens, while denying this privilege
to US citizens from other states. A US
prosecutor in Texas chose to grant
immunity from prosecution to an illegal-alien drug smuggler, rather than to two
US Border Patrol agents (Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean,
who are now serving sentences of over ten years in prison). In many parts of the country, policemen are
told not to arrest suspected illegal aliens for their crime (of illegal entry),
but to only arrest US citizens or illegal aliens suspected of high crimes.
government has declared war on its own middle class. In medicine, growths that consume the body
are referred to as cancer. The US
government has become a cancer on US
society. It has abandoned the founders’
principles of “government of, by and for the people.” It exists only to promote the welfare of the
wealthy elite, not to protect the welfare of the people. The US
government has betrayed the country’s people and its founding principles, and it
will not long endure.
When I was a young man, it was standard practice, even among
leading firms, for businessmen traveling together to share hotel rooms. This was in the 1960s, when there were very
few professional women. As the
proportion of women grew to the “tipping point,” all of a sudden the policy was
changed so that every person had his own hotel room.
In this age of political correctness, it seems that there is
now a euphemism for everything that might be viewed as common, ordinary, menial,
lower-class or inferior. Porters at
airports are now “skycaps.” Students and
teachers are now called “learners.” Servants
are now called maids, butlers, cooks and gardeners.
My wife and I recently took a cruise from Charleston
to Bermuda. Every
room on the ship was a “stateroom.”
Heaven forbid that someone would have to bear the indignity of staying
in a cabin, or berth. There were no
“second class” cabins – you could only be “upgraded” to a superior class.
The US Government Caused the Mortgage Crisis
government abandoned its responsibility to regulate financial markets recently,
and encouraged people to purchase homes for no down payment. The purpose of a down payment, of course, is
to prevent the sale of homes to people who cannot afford them. When I was young, commercial real estate
loans required a 20 percent down payment and government-insured loans required
a down payment of about 4-5 percent.
It was just a matter of time until the foolish practice of
no-down-payments to unqualified persons ended in catastrophe, which we are now
seeing in the collapse of the mortgage market and housing market. The government caused this problem. It abrogated its responsibility to regulate
financial markets. It did so to generate
more wealth for homebuilders. Now that
large numbers of loans are in default, the government is taking actions to
protect the lenders, not the borrowers.
In fact, it recently passed legislation making it much more difficult
for individuals to declare bankruptcy.
Once again, the US
government has sided with the interests of the wealthy, and deserted the middle
Since the dawn of civilization, the primary purpose of
organized religion has been to justify theologically the authority and dominion
of rulers over the ruled (“divine right of kings”).
For many years, the US
government has adopted a policy of massive international free trade, massive
immigration, and open borders. Those
policies are directly aimed at destroying the US
middle class. The US
government actively encourages illegal immigration, not only by refusing to
secure the border and refusing to deport illegal aliens, but by offering them free social, educational and health services and making
every effort to grant them a “path to citizenship,” despite the strong
disapproval of the electorate.
In recent months, the Catholic Church has promoted amnesty
for illegal aliens, and the granting of sanctuary for them. It has clearly aligned itself with government
in aiding and abetting the alien invasion.
government is guilty of high treason in not repelling the alien invasion –
under the US Constitution, the president takes a vow
to protect the country from invasion.
The Church and the US
government have joined forces in waging war on the US
is in fact a fascist dictatorship – a highly nationalistic country in which the
interests of the government parallel those of business. It has a strong ally in the Church, in the
repression of the middle class.
A business associate of mine is originally from Sri
When she left Sri Lanka
to come to the US,
the person sitting on the airplane seat next to her was a young woman about her
age. My friend speaks fluent English,
and she now has a very well paying job as a professional person in the United
Her seat-mate, who spoke no English, was headed for a job as a maid in a
Paul Wolfowitz was until last year
the head of the World Bank. He arranged
for his girlfriend to obtain a very high paying job at the World Bank, and he was
therefore fired (“forced to resign”). I
heard on the news recently that he is to be named head of the US Arms Control
and Disarmament Agency. Can this be
true? The average US
citizen goes to jail for crimes involving hundreds of thousands of
dollars. But Mr. Wolfowitz
is rewarded with another high-profile job in our government.
Lewis “Scooter” Libby was convicted of high crimes against
the state, and President George Bush pardoned him (and the wealthy elite paid
his fine). Sandy Berger stole classified
documents with impunity. Our government
looks after its own.
If We Leave Iraq, It Will Be a Disaster?
You often hear the statement that if we stop the war in Iraq
before winning, “it will be a disaster.”
It is already a disaster. Things are far worse after five years of US
domination than under former dictator Saddam Hussein. Iraqi citizens are being slaughtered in
scores every week. Our reconstruction
projects (electricity, water, sewers) are considered failures.
We invaded Iraq
for the oil. We do not have the oil, and
the war is costing us hundreds of billions of dollars each year. We could easily win the war in Iraq,
but choose not to do so (see my article, “How to Win the War in Iraq”
for discussion). Many people question
why we fight on. The reason is easy to
see. The war, paid for by the US
taxpaying middle class, funnels billions of dollars from the middle class
taxpayer to the wealthy arms merchants.
The reason for any government action is always the same: It’s the money,
stupid. The government serves the
The US Government Wages War on the US Middle Class
government has declared war on the US
middle class. With its policies of
massive international free trade, mass immigration and open borders, it places
its middle class in direct competition with workers in poor countries making a
few dollars a day. Why does it do
this? Why does it adopt policies that
are destroying the middle class? For the money. For the wealthy elite.
By its policies, the US
government has destroyed the land, the environment, US
culture, and the quality of life for the middle class. It continues to wage a costly war, refusing
to achieve an easy victory, simply to make the rich richer and drive the
taxpaying middle class into poverty.
Taxes are high. Inflation is very
high. Real earnings of citizens are
shrinking in the US
while the government grants good jobs and citizenship to aliens. Foreign doctors who practice in the US
are paid millions of dollars from government medical programs, all at the
expense of the US
taxpayer. These people are paid
thousands of times what they would receive in their home countries, because of
US policies that have driven medical costs sky-high. The government has betrayed the middle class.
It is bent on destroying it.
Hillary Clinton, an aspirant to the US
presidency, claims that she is in favor of “universal health care.” This is a complete lie. She is in favor of universal health
insurance, not universal health care.
She wants to force everyone to purchase health insurance, in order to
pay for the costs of medical care – costs that have been obscenely bloated by
decades of government policies aimed at generating massive incomes and wealth
for the medical establishment. US
health care costs are the highest in the world, and the extent of coverage is
the worst in the developed world. Clinton’s
policy is oriented solely to serve the wealthy elite – the doctors, hospitals,
pharmaceutical companies, and insurance companies. She has no concern for the health care of the
average citizen. If she cared about
providing universal health care to people, she would be proposing a larger US
Public Health Service, with neighborhood clinics offering free basic medical
care. Instead she offers to tax our
people more, and provide even higher levels of income to the health care
industry. She wants to keep medical
costs propped up at obscene levels, and force everyone to pay these bloated
costs. She wants simply to transfer
money and taxes from the middle class to the rich. She serves only the wealthy elite.
calls for “change,” but he never says what he will change. That is because he will not change anything,
except who occupies the White House. (On
February 20, John McCain made an interesting statement: “I will fight every
moment of every day in this campaign to make sure that Americans are not
deceived by an eloquent but empty call for change.”) As soon as Obama
started emphasizing change – and God knows we need change! – the
other contenders chimed in. Under any of
the three leading presidential contenders – John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama – there will be no fundamental
change at all. They all serve the wealthy
elite. They will continue the same
corrupt government that we have now.
They will continue the government’s policies of massive international
free trade, massive immigration and open borders, without change. They will continue to wage war on the US
middle class. They will continue to
serve the wealthy elite. They will
continue to commit treason by refusing to repel the alien invasion. They will continue to destroy America.
All the candidates want is a change of the leadership in Washington
from Bush and his cronies to them and their cronies. They do not want to change anything that will
slow the generation of wealth for their Illuminati masters. If the candidates were for meaningful change,
they would propose things that would slow and eventually stop the global
destruction of the environment and global warming. They would take steps to decrease human
population and human energy consumption.
They would take steps to bring an immediate halt to deforestation, the destruction
of 30,000 species per year, and global warming.
They would take steps to stop the war on the middle class, stop the
population explosion that is destroying the nation and the planet, and restore
the quality of life for the middle class to what it used to be a half-century
ago. They never address such issues.
Here follows a list, off the top of my head, of some
significant changes that the candidates might suggest, if they were sincere and
serious about change that would make a difference in people’s lives and the
long-term survival of the human race and the biosphere. Most of these suggestions relate solely to
improving quality of life for the US
middle class, protecting the biosphere, and enhancing the long-term survival of
the human and other species. None are
motivated by morality concerns.
termination of the policy of growth-based economics, and embracing of
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s entropy-based economic
action to bring an immediate halt to deforestation, worldwide. This would mean, among other things, war
winning of the war in Iraq
(see my article “How to Win the War in Iraq”
of the US
borders, except as required for national defense and planetary management.
mass deportation of all illegal aliens (can be implemented in a few weeks
making invasion of the US
a crime punishable by concentration camp or capital punishment).
of all persons who became citizens under the Immigration Act of 1965 and
of birthright citizenship for aliens.
health care, implemented through universal provision of basic health care
in neighborhood health clinics.
of public-school bussing – all public schools within a child’s walking
of prison sentences of over one year.
Replace most jail or prison sentences with immediate public shaming
(stocks, pillories, caning, menial public service). Replace all prison sentences of over one
year with banishment. Immediate
release or banishment (depending on level of threat to society) of all
of all foreign trade, except as required for national defense and
planetary management. This includes
food – no food imports, no food exports.
immigration, except as required for national defense.
draft of all citizens aged 18, for two years of national service.
of all housing developments built on arable land.
of all structures built in flood plains or places of exceptional natural
beauty or wild-animal resources.
of battery (industrial) production of animals and plantation production of
trees. Termination of harvesting of
wildlife for human food.
Termination of factory fishing.
of private cars. (With a stable
population, mass transportation works very well.) Replacement of internal-combustion cars
with electric cars.
only (not just “official” English only, but English only, period).
health, education and social services for all citizens. Quarantine for all dangerous diseases,
such as HIV. Termination of organ
transplants, which are cannibalism.
Termination of abortions.
Termination of heroic measures to prolong life.
implementation of the goal of moving US
population to the level that can be supported by solar energy (not over 63
million people at a low level of living).
of the income tax for 99 percent of the people (as was the original
concept when the income tax was introduced in 1913).
of articles of impeachment or against all living presidents and
ex-presidents, on charges of treason for aiding and abetting illegal
immigration (under the US Constitution, the US
president takes a vow to protect the country from invasion).
- See http://www.foundationwebsite.org/Platform.htm
for other suggestions, and http://www.foundationwebsite.org/PositionStatement.htm
for some political philosophy.
The preceding suggestions for change may seem draconian, or
radical, or reactionary, or extreme, or communist, but they (or more extreme but
similar changes) will all come to pass in any event within a few years, as Hubbert’s Peak passes (i.e., global production of petroleum
begins to decline). The issue for most
of the changes listed above is not whether they will occur, but whether they
will be rationally planned and graceful or uncontrolled and catastrophic.
Are the current selection of
candidates willing to implement any of the preceding changes, or any other
significant change that might improve the quality of life for the US
middle class? Are they willing to take
any effective steps to halt the destruction of the biosphere? No.
They crave only money, power and forbidden sex. As Plato predicted for the leaders of all
democracies, they pander to the populace, promising it anything that they think
it wants to hear. They are not
“guardians” or moral leaders. They
pander to the masses while the planet is destroyed. They serve the wealthy elite. They serve the Illuminati who are bent on the
destruction of the planet through global industrialization. They serve themselves. They are working hard to bring about the
total destruction of the biosphere and the end of mankind. They work for the agony and “gnashing of
teeth” that feeds the ravenous and insatiable appetites of the evil.
Roger Milliken Knows the Score
On a road leading to my home is an industrial building with
the name “Gibbs” on it. I asked someone
once what does “Gibbs” make.
Facetiously, he responded, “money,” and then he went on to explain that
Mr. Gibbs has made a fortune by selling the equipment from closed US
manufacturing companies, such as textile mills, to foreign firms.
My friend mentioned that whenever Roger Milliken
(the industrialist, who lives in my home town of Spartanburg)
is forced to close a plant because of foreign competition, he has every single
machine destroyed. He is not about to
let foreigners use American machinery to compete against US labor. Mr. Milliken is a
standard of living was once the highest in the world, because we protected our
workers from having to compete with workers in poor countries who earned
pennies a day. We could have continued
having a high quality of life for our middle class,
simply by imposing tariffs to offset that promote slave wages and environmental
destruction as means of achieving a competitive advantage. Instead, the US
government has adopted policies that maximize trade and benefit the rich, while
destroying the quality of life for its middle class. These policies are destroying the US
middle class and turning the US
into a third-world country. In just a
few decades under these policies, US
population has almost doubled, the environment has been ravaged, and most
families have been forced to have both parents work in the competitive labor
Why does the US
middle class allow its own destruction at the hands of its greedy, venal
government? How long will it endure
before it says, “no more,” “no longer”?
The US Government Is Systematically Destroying the
US Middle Class
The US Government operates a guest-worker program – the HIB
visa program – to offer high-tech jobs to foreigners. The US
government refuses to impose tariffs to offset the low wages in countries that
pay their workers little and refuse to pay for environmental protection. The US
government allows mass illegal immigration, which depresses wages of US citizens and robs many of their livelihood. The US
government has allowed the loss of its manufacturing base to other countries,
leaving little for its own people to do.
government allows – in fact encourages – foreigners to send remittances back to
their home countries. The US government
aids and abets the alien invasion, which destroys US land, robs the poor of
their livelihoods, and contributes to global warming (since immigrants consume
far more energy and fossil fuels in the US than in their home countries). The US
jails its own citizens while granting immunity to illegal-alien drug
smugglers. The US
government offers free social, economic and health services to illegal aliens –
services paid for by taxes on the oppressed US
middle class. The US
government has allowed the destruction of US manufacturing by one-sided trade
policies and practices. The US
government would sell our port operations to foreign governments. The US
government allows selling of infrastructure – paid for by taxes from the US
middle class – such as highways, to foreign firms. The US
government allows Mexican truckers free use of highways that have been bought
and paid for by taxes on US citizens. The
allows foreigners to buy US
land and other assets. The US
government wages a high-cost war in Iraq
that must be paid for by the US
middle class, through crushing taxes and high inflation. It refuses to press for an easy victory, in
order to funnel massive amounts of money to arms dealers. The US
now taxes Americans so heavily that both parents in a family now have to work
in the competitive labor market, simply to make ends meet. Because of a complete failure of the
government to protect privacy, identity theft is now rampant. The government does nothing about this,
because the economic activity required to repair this damage improves the gross
national product, makes the rich richer, and significantly hurts only the
For a society to be healthy and survive, it must have
meaningful employment for most of its citizens.
Through its policies, the US
government has destroyed most of its manufacturing capacity. In today’s world, it cannot exist solely as a
service economy. Most people cannot be
rocket scientists, and many people are not suited to work in the service sector. The US
cannot exist simply by having its citizens take in
each other’s washing.
government has turned against the US
middle class. Its policies, designed to
produce more wealth for the rich, are destroying the environment, the culture
that made the country great, and the quality of life for the middle class. The US
government is in the process of destroying its middle class. The US
government no longer holds to the founding principles that made the country
great. The US
government – the ruling class – is a cancer that is destroying the country.
Life is like a football game. Within the game, the action and score are
important. When the game is over, they
are of no significance.
A few years ago, I had the lenses of my eyes replaced,
because of cataracts. I was amazed to
see, after the operation, that the sun was no longer yellow – it was bright
When we are young children, the sun is white. Pure white. As we age, our lenses become yellow, and the sun
looks yellow. It is painted yellow in
paintings, and the sun’s color is called yellow.
Things are not always as they seem.
The security measures outside US embassies are really
something to behold. Barricades and
barriers, high walls, tire spikes, razor wire.
If I were in charge, I would eliminate all of this, and turn
embassies into normal buildings such as most foreign embassies are in Washington,
of foreign embassies is the responsibility of the host country. If any country failed to prevent attacks on
our embassy, I would simply remove our presence from that country.
You often hear the president and other US
government leaders say that mass deportation of illegal aliens is not a
realistic option. What a lie! It most certainly is! All illegal aliens could easily be deported
within a few weeks. All that is required
is to punish this crime with severe penalties, such as hard labor in
concentration camps, or execution. The US
does not take effective steps to prevent invasion by aliens or to deport the
12-20 million who are here because is has not will to do so. It has simple, practical, low-cost options
available to do so very quickly, if it so desired. It does not desire to do so, because the
massive population of illegal aliens makes the rich richer. The wealthy elite who control the US
want these people here, and their US
puppet government is not about to do anything to get rid of them. It is not going to do anything that would
threaten the continuation of explosive population growth, since that is what
the wealthy want.
Any nation that refuses to protect its borders, and defend
its citizens from invasion, has abrogated the right to govern. In aiding and abetting the alien invasion,
government is guilty of high treason.
It will not last long.
You often hear people on television claim, sanctimoniously,
that they are not against immigration, just against illegal immigration (Lou Dobbs, are you reading this?). It is population
growth from any source that is destroying the country, and immigration
(immigrants and their progeny) is the single reason for population growth in
the US for the
past several decades. On average, each
immigrant to the United States
is the direct cause of the destruction of one acre of natural land, caused by
conversion of the land to infrastructure required by the additional
population. Immigrants from poor
countries use up to then times as much commercial energy as they did in their
home countries; the burning of fossil fuels to provide this energy contributes
greatly to atmospheric pollution and global warming. Each year, illegal-alien immigrants kill more
US citizens than
American soldiers are killed in the war in Iraq. Mass immigration (legal or illegal), without
assimilation, is resulting in the destruction of US
culture. That is the culture that
founded and nurtured this great nation; most immigrants are from corrupt or
feckless cultures that left them to rot in poverty and desperation – the very
cultures that they are bringing to the US and that are now overwhelming
traditional US culture.
By 1972, birth rates in the US
had fallen to replacement levels for both whites and blacks. The country’s population had stabilized. With a stable or reducing population, we
could turn to concentrating on improving the environment and the quality of
life for all Americans, and establishing a long-term sustainable society. The only problem with this is that it does
not generate as much wealth for the rich as a growth-based economy. So instead of opting for a stable society,
the US embarked
on a program of rapid population growth.
As a direct result of the Immigration Act of 1965, the country’s
population has exploded, and continues to grow at about one percent per year. Environmental destruction is increasing. National parks are flooded with people. Open land is nonexistent in most parts of the
country. Beautiful natural properties
are available now only to the wealthy.
We were essentially self-sufficient in 1965, and could be
today, but instead we now import forty percent of our food. Virtually none of this imported food is
inspected, and our citizens are routinely poisoned with bad food from Communist
China and other countries (e.g., contaminated fish, poisoned pet food). Most of our toys are now produced in
Communist China, many using toxic lead paint.
This did not have to happen. We
were in the enviable position of having a stable population and a modest
population density. We had accomplished
the “demographic transition” that many peoples dream of. The insatiable greed of America’s
wealthy elite could never be satisfied with a stable country. They cried out for more, lying that free
trade would benefit everyone, pandering to the greed of the masses. Their thrall, the US
government, has destroyed the country’s environment, its culture and the
quality of life for the middle class, solely to generate more wealth for their
population is shrinking. Ours is
represents the future. We represent the
is moving toward a population that can be supported solely on solar
energy. We are moving farther and
farther from that situation.
The nations of the world have two choices – move gracefully
to a population level that can be supported by solar energy, as Russia is now
doing, or maintain the population at a level far above that, in which case it
will eventually collapse catastrophically.
(and a few other countries, almost all in the North) is following the former
path; the US
the latter. It did not have to end this
way. We had a stable population in 1965,
and we threw it away. That year was the
turning point in US
history, and marks the beginning of the end for the United
has made no efforts to prepare for life in a recurrent-solar-energy-based
world. At a low level of living,
recurrent solar energy can support about 63 million people in the US;
at a high level of living, recurrent solar energy can support about one-tenth
this number, or 630 thousand. The
current (2008) population of the United States
is 304 million, and it is increasing by about three million per year (from
immigration). That is about five to
fifty times as many as can be supported by recurrent solar energy, and the
situation is getting worse every year.
It is interesting to compare the situation for the US
to that for Russia. Although Russia
has a larger land area than the US,
it has less arable land. At a low level
of living, solar energy can support about 44 million people in Russia,
and at a high level of living it can support about 440 thousand people. The current population of Russia
is 142 million people, and it is declining by about one-half million per
year. This is about three to thirty
times what solar energy can support, but at least Russia
is headed in the right direction (i.e., its population is declining to a
recurrent-solar-energy-based level). As
the world reverts to solar energy, the US
population faces catastrophic collapse. For
more on this, see http://www.foundationwebsite.org/PopProfileAllCountries.txt,
http://www.foundationwebsite.org/DestUserManINTL.htm and http://www.foundationwebsite.org/Destiny2005.zip
(the DESTINY program -- a large file (24 megabytes; requires Microsoft Access
2002 to run).
Eugenics: US Illuminati Working to Improve US Gene Pool
By 1965, US
population growth had stabilized. As
this happened, the US Illuminati realized that the best individuals on the
planet would be migrating to other countries, improving those countries’ gene
pools relative to our own. To prevent a
deterioration of the US gene pool, the US Illuminati, represented most prominently
by Senator Ted Kennedy and the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, changed US
immigration policy (under the Immigration Act of 1965) to allow the flooding of
the country with immigrants from all cultures on the planet. Some individuals, such as North
Carolina’s Senator Sam Ervin, asserted that this change
would destroy US
culture, and history has proved them right.
The country no longer represents the founders’ principles of government
of, by and for the people. The country
now exists only to serve the wealthy elite.
The gap in income and wealth between the wealthy and the rest of the
country is growing. From a political and
cultural perspective, the US
has now joined the ranks of the third world.
This was accomplished by the Immigration Act of 1965 and the
government’s policy of mass immigration and open borders.
Machiavelli asserted long ago that
there were just three ways to administer a conquered people: annihilate them;
set up a puppet government of powerful local people; and overwhelm them with
your own population, as the Communist Chinese are now doing in Tibet. As did China,
the US Illuminati chose the third option – overwhelming the US
population by flooding it with peoples from other cultures – as its means of
culture and the US
middle class. The transformation of the US
to a third-world country is well under way.
Closed populations eventually decay. Even the smallest band of human beings and
other animals knows instinctively that it must accept strangers (“new blood”)
for the gene pool to remain healthy.
Without war to cull the population or migration from the outside,
populations that begin with strong, healthy, exceptionally capable and daring
people – such as the early immigrants from Europe to the
New World – inevitably succumb to Galton’s
phenomenon of “regression to the mean.”
The US Illuminati knew this, and that is why they worked hard for the
Immigration Act of 1965.
The US Illuminati have, through eugenics, crafted the
country into the world’s finest killing machine. But, in the absence of war, selective
culling, or out-migration, the US
population is now very bloated – and very average. It is massively larger than can be supported
by solar energy, with a large portion that is failing to thrive. Now that the best of all nations have been
drawn to the US,
all that remains is to selectively cull the original stock, much of which has
“regressed to the mean.” This phase is
now underway. The US
government has now turned against the US
middle class and the traditional cultures, including the white Anglo-Saxon
Protestant culture and the African-American cultures. Through its policies of open borders and
massive international free trade, it has destroyed the nation’s security. The stage is now set for the final step of the
eugenics process, which is decimation, or perhaps annihilation (by catastrophic
elimination), of the original population.
It is said that when Hitler saw that he was losing the
Second World War, he could not come to terms with the fact that his great
Teutonic nation was being defeated by the United
States, a mongrel nation. What Hitler failed to realize that he was not
defeated by a mongrel nation at all, but by another Teutonic nation. Most of the immigrants to the US
in the early 1800s were from Germany,
and most of the rest were from other Teutonic cultures. Hitler was in fact destroyed by a band from his
own Teutonic culture – fellow Hyperboreans of the
Since passage of the Immigration Act of 1965, the US
has been flooded with peoples from all other cultures. The Teutonic culture – the most aggressive
and capable culture of the present era – that gave the US
its life blood and vigor (or should I say vril) has
been much diluted. The outcome of the
next great war may be very different for America. (It is interesting to note that the psychics
say that the Second World War was simply a prelude to the next, really big,
When I was a boy, I was told that in the End Times, the
Eagle and the Bear will unite to conquer the rest of the world. At that time, it was assumed by many that the
Eagle represented the United States,
and the Bear represented Russia. The prevailing view of my youth no longer
holds. The Eagle is Germany
and the Bear is Russia.
February 2008, the United States Navy fired a missile (a Standard
Missile 3) at a nonfunctioning spy satellite and destroyed it. The putative reason for this action was that
the satellite contained toxic fuel (hydrazine), and the US
did not want it returning to Earth in a single mass.
How gullible does the US
government think that its citizens – and the rest of the world – are? If that were a real concern, the satellite
would have not been put up in the first place, or other satellites would have
been destroyed in similar fashion before, since we have long had the technology
to do this. Both Russia
and China have
scoffed at the explanation, knowing full well that this action – shooting down
a moving satellite – was a very useful test of our antimissile system.
A few months ago, a home was built on the vacant lot across
the street from my home. It took about
three days to erect the structure, and a few weeks more to finish the house.
government presses for a policy of building more and more new homes. It does this only to serve the homebuilding
industry. The country does not need, and
in the long term cannot afford, an ever-increasing population. Yet the government points each quarter to the
number of “new home starts” as a glowing indicator of the health of our system. It is in fact an indicator of the
“growth-based-economics” sickness that is destroying our society.
We cannot continue to build new homes forever (except to
replace old or destroyed ones). The policy
of continual growth is a corrupt one that results in the destruction of the
biosphere. In a stable-population
society, we could build infrastructure to last.
With an exploding population, it is impossible to build permanent
infrastructure, such as mass rail transit and other permanent systems. It is not necessary to build permanent homes,
such as out of brick or block, for a society that is transient. The US
is now a transient society – and I am referring to a short existence, not inner
mobility of its population. It now
operates solely on the vacuous principle of generating more and more wealth for
its wealthy elite. This corrupt society
will not long endure.
is building temporary homes for a temporary population. I guess this makes sense, after all.
invests massive amounts for programs to promote equality of outcome for its less-able
schoolchildren, but it fights hard to keep its gifted children from
excelling. Time magazine had an interesting article on this topic recently.
Ralph Nader for President
On February 24, Ralph Nader
announced that he would enter the 2008 contest for the US
presidency. His announcement was met
with strong disapproval from some members of the Democratic Party, who view him
as a “spoiler” who caused Al Gore to lose the presidency (by his siphoning more
votes from Gore than from Bush).
The wrath of the Democrats on this issue should be
redirected from Nader to the US
governmental system. Our system of
electing the president is a “winner take all” one in which the president and
vice president are elected independently of the US Congress (House of
Representatives and Senate). Under this
system, candidates from several similar parties will split the votes in support
of their views, and provide an advantage to a party that stands alone.
This dilemma is avoided under a parliamentary system. Under a parliamentary system, members of
parliament are elected (in similar fashion to our House of Representatives),
and the elected members of parliament elect a leader, the prime minister. If the members of parliament are from many
different parties so that no party has a majority, then coalitions are formed
and the majority coalition elects the prime minister. Under this system, the leader of government
reflects a majority of the people, even if no single party has a majority. Under our system, in the case in which two
similar parties split votes, the winner may well represent a minority of the
Those who criticize Nader are in
essence asserting that no independent or “third-party” candidate (member of any
party other that the Democratic Party and the Republican Party) should ever run
for president. This is not a reasonable
view. It allowance for “spoilers” is
considered a serious flaw in our system, then efforts would be better directed
to changing our system to a parliamentary system, rather than criticizing
independents or third-party candidates who run for president.
I have been consulting for a few weeks in Monrovia,
is situated five time zones ahead of my home town of Spartanburg,
South Carolina, and so I
experience some “jet lag” and have trouble sleeping. Whenever I am in this situation, I purchase
wine from a local grocery store, and have a glass whenever I wake up at an
unreasonable hour and cannot get back to sleep.
Wine is an excellent sleeping aid.
You may have read in one of my other articles that I am
highly allergic to a chemical that is added to wine in the US
as a preservative. That chemical is
sodium metabisulfite (another similar one is
potassium metabisulfite). Even a half-glass of wine treated with sodim metabisulfite is sufficient
to give me a dull headache that lasts for two days. In many other countries, these toxic chemicals
are not used to preserve wine. What is
used instead is a much more benign chemical, sulfur dioxide (chemical symbol SO2). This gas has been used since ancient times to
preserve wine. In olden times, wine casks
were treated with sulfur dioxide by burning a sulfur candle in the cask before
filling it with wine.
Many wines from France,
other traditional wine-producing countries often use SO2 as the
preservative, at least for that part of their production that is not exported
to the United States. In the US,
I rarely drink wine, since I don’t want the headache that follows. In the US,
wine distributors must label the wine as “Contains sulfites,” but they are not
required to tell what those sulfites are.
In fact, all wines contain some naturally occurring sulfites, so this
labeling is gratuitous – it tells the consumer exactly nothing. I enjoy wine, and so whenever I am in a
country, such as Liberia
where I can purchase wine that is treated with sulfur dioxide, I do so. (Some specialty stores carry
“no-sulfite-added” wines (sometimes called “organic” wines), but they are few
in number and costly – usually about $15.00 per bottle, which I consider quite
excessive for a good bottle of wine.)
Here in Monrovia,
the local grocery stores have a fine selection of wines from France. Their prices are very reasonable, starting at
USD2.50, with many at about USD6.00, some at about USD10.00, and a few higher
(e.g., USD15.00 or more). In Germany,
you can buy a good Italian wine for as low as US D2.00. In the US,
there is no wine (in the grocery stores near my home) for USD2.00. Wines start at about USD6.00, and they are
usually pretty bad. Even wines that are
of satisfactory quality in their home countries (such as Australia’s
Yellowtail) are of poor quality in the US. The preservatives added to US wines often
give them a harsh, metallic taste.
I was planning to stay in Monrovia
for about four weeks, and so after I arrived I purchased seven bottles of
wine. That is sufficient for about 1/3
bottle per day – sufficient to ensure good sleep. The quality of the wine has been excellent. Here are the wines that I purchased:
- Partager vin
de table de France, vin rouge and vin blanc, 12% vol., B&G importers, 750 ml,
$6.00. Excellent. (I bought two
bottles of each.)
& Guestier Chardonnay vin de pays d’Oc,
2005, 13.5% vol.75 cl, $7.75. Very good.
de Blancs vin pays des
de Gascogne, 2006, vol.
Alc. 12%, B&G importers, 750 ml, $6.50, OK.
Consort vin table de
France, Barton & Guestier, alc. 12% vol., 750 ml, $6.00. OK.
- Cuvée Speciale vin
de table vin rouge, B&G importers, 12%,
$6.00. Poor but not awful.
The preservative notice on these wines is: Konserveringstoffer sulfitter, contains sulfites, contient des
Since the $6.00 wines were so good, the next time I return
to Monrovia I shall purchase a
couple of bottles of the $2.50 wine, to see how they taste.
By the way, the local beer, Club Beer, is excellent. It is every bit as good as Heinekin and Becks. The Club Beer costs $2.00 a bottle, the
imports $3.50. (I drink a bottle of beer
with meals. As a sleep aid, wine is far
preferable to beer for me, since it has a much higher concentration of
alcohol. A single bottle of beer, with
4-5% alcohol, has no noticeable effect on me.
Beer would not help me sleep at all unless I drank three or four
bottles, which I have no intention of doing – I would be up all night visiting
the Green City
Abu Dhabi, one
of the states of the United Arab Emirates,
is undertaking a project to build the world’s first high-technology “green”
city. The city, six square kilometers in
area (1,483 acres, or about a square mile) will house 50,000 people, 1,500
businesses, a university (The Masdar Institute of
Science and Technology), and the headquarters of the Abu Dhabi Future Energy
Company. It is planned that the city
will produce essentially zero carbon emissions and essentially zero waste. It will
be powered mainly by solar energy, supplemented by other “renewable” sources of
energy. The city will be automobile-free,
with every point no farther than 200 meters from electric public transport.
The city will take about ten years to build and is estimated
to cost USD22 billion. The project began
in 2006. It is planned that the first
phase will be complete and habitable by 2009.
The effort to construct Masdar (or
– the word “masdar” means “source” in Arabic) is a
project of The Masdar Initiative. The project is headed by the Abu Dhabi Future
Energy Company. The planner is Foster
and Partners of the United Kingdom. Project partners include Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, General Electric, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, Mitsubishi,
Rolls-Royce, Total SA, Mitsui, Fiat and German solar energy company Conergy. The project
has been endorsed by the World Wildlife Fund.